Free Website Accessibility Survey

Understanding whether users can quickly identify primary menu labels is essential. Clear navigation reduces frustration and supports better engagement.

Ease of interaction with submenus indicates whether hierarchical structures are obvious. Complex dropdowns may hinder smooth browsing.

Search placement and visibility directly affect discoverability. A visible search tool empowers users to find content faster.

Link wording guides user expectations. Descriptive labels prevent misclicks and improve task completion.

Users bring mental models from other sites; alignment reduces cognitive load. Mismatches can lead to confusion and drop-off.

Breadcrumbs help users understand where they are in the site hierarchy. Clear indicators support orientation and backtracking.

Headings structure content flow and scanning efficiency. Logical sequences help users predict where to find details.

Consistency in link destinations builds trust. Unexpected results can erode confidence and hinder task success.

Easy access to the homepage serves as an anchor point for users. A visible home link reassures users they can restart navigation at any time.

This holistic question captures the user's big-picture understanding. It highlights whether the structure supports intuitive exploration.

Font size influences legibility, especially for users with visual impairments. Comfortable text reduces eye strain and increases dwell time.

Proper spacing improves text scanning and comprehension. Crowded text blocks can overwhelm and discourage reading.

Contrast affects readability for all users and is critical for those with low vision. Adequate contrast meets accessibility standards and reduces reading difficulty.

Using plain language facilitates understanding across diverse audiences. Jargon or overly complex sentences can alienate readers.

Informative headings support content organization and quick scanning. They guide users to the sections most relevant to their needs.

Long paragraphs can discourage reading and cause users to skim or abandon content. Breaking text into manageable chunks increases engagement.

Lists break down complex information into digestible pieces. They enhance clarity and allow users to absorb key points quickly.

Errors undermine credibility and distract readers. Clear, error-free text strengthens user trust and professionalism.

Relevant visuals can reinforce messages and aid retention. Poorly matched images may confuse or distract users.

This broad assessment captures the user's overall impression. It helps prioritize readability improvements across the site.

Screen reader testing reveals how well content is announced. It highlights missing alt text or navigation issues that impair usability.

Labels are crucial for screen reader users to understand input requirements. Missing or unclear labels lead to form abandonment.

Voice control compatibility helps users with motor impairments. Properly tagged elements ensure accurate voice navigation.

ARIA attributes guide assistive technologies on element roles. Clear announcements prevent confusion about interactive functionality.

Accessible modals should trap focus and return it upon close. Inaccessible dynamic content can disrupt navigation flow.

Keyboard users need clear focus indicators and logical tab order. Gaps in keyboard support hinder complete site access.

Properly designed layouts adapt to increased text size without loss of content. Fixed layouts that break impede readability.

ARIA landmarks help screen reader users navigate regions like headers or main content. Missing landmarks force users to listen through entire pages.

Captions and transcripts are essential for deaf or hard-of-hearing users. They also improve comprehension for non-native speakers.

This overall question captures the end-to-end experience. It highlights areas requiring prioritized accessibility fixes.

Color harmony enhances user comfort and brand consistency. Clashing or washed-out palettes can distract or fatigue viewers.

High contrast is necessary for users with low vision or color blindness. It ensures text and controls stand out clearly.

Responsive graphics preserve clarity across screen sizes. Improper scaling can lead to pixelation or obscured details.

Visible focus states guide keyboard users on current active elements. Hidden indicators break keyboard navigation flow.

Subtle animations can improve engagement when used sparingly. Overly flashy transitions may disorient or trigger sensitivities.

Clear state changes confirm interactive readiness. Missing feedback leaves users uncertain about clickability.

Proper padding and margins prevent misclicks and improve readability. Crowded interfaces can frustrate or confuse users.

Relevant visuals reinforce content meaning and brand voice. Irrelevant imagery can divert attention away from core messages.

Consistency in fonts, colors, and layouts builds familiarity. Inconsistencies can make the site feel disjointed.

This summary question captures user perception of design fairness. It points to areas where style may hinder access.

Clear guidance prevents user errors and abandoned forms. Ambiguous instructions lead to confusion and incomplete submissions.

Explicit markers for mandatory inputs help users prioritize. Unmarked fields can cause frustration when errors occur.

Descriptive errors guide users to correct mistakes quickly. Generic or missing messages increase abandonment rates.

Well-designed selections reduce decision-making time. Poorly structured lists can be cumbersome, especially with many options.

Logical tab sequences support keyboard-only users in completing forms efficiently. Random tab order disrupts input flow.

Consistent behavior in interactive controls builds user confidence. Erratic responses to input elements can lead to errors.

Reset options let users start over without reloading the page. Missing reset functionality may force unwanted navigation away.

Clear confirmations reassure users that their input was received. Ambiguous feedback can cause duplicate submissions.

Unexpected timeouts disrupt task completion and frustrate users. Giving users control over submission timing improves experience.

This global question captures user satisfaction with input interactions. It helps prioritize enhancements to key engagement points.

Fluid layouts maintain accessibility across device widths. Breakpoints must preserve readability and functionality.

Adequate touch targets prevent accidental taps and frustration. Small or crowded controls are problematic on mobile.

Responsive media ensures content remains clear and legible. Fixed-size elements can overflow or become unusable.

Hamburger menus or slide-out panels should be easily discoverable. Hidden navigation can confuse mobile users.

Fast-loading pages are crucial for users on varied network conditions. Slow performance leads to high bounce rates.

Mobile users need touch-friendly controls to close overlays. Non-responsive modals can trap users on a page.

Horizontal scrolling breaks the natural vertical reading flow. Content should reflow or resize without side-scrolling.

Mobile form usability depends on label visibility and input spacing. Tiny fields hamper finger accuracy and form completion.

Zoom controls aid users with low vision on small screens. Disabled zoom prevents users from adjusting text size for comfort.

This summary captures the end-user experience on handheld devices. It highlights whether responsive strategies meet user expectations.