Free Team Dysfunction Survey

Rationale: This question highlights your team's willingness to seek clarity and reduce misunderstandings. It uncovers proactive behaviors that keep projects on track.

Rationale: Assessing channel effectiveness helps determine if tools support your team's communication needs. It reveals gaps where messages might not reach everyone.

Rationale: Documentation ensures accountability and keeps everyone aligned on next steps. This question measures follow-through practices after discussions.

Rationale: Timely updates prevent surprises and help team members adjust priorities. It shows whether change management is communicated well.

Rationale: Constructive feedback fosters improvement and trust. This question checks if your communication style encourages growth.

Rationale: Clear points of contact reduce delays and confusion. It evaluates whether roles and expertise are well understood.

Rationale: Identifying overlooked communications highlights potential information silos. It helps in designing better follow-up processes.

Rationale: Time management and agendas show respect for participants' schedules. This question measures meeting efficiency and focus.

Rationale: Tool effectiveness impacts collaboration quality. It reveals whether technology supports or hinders your communication goals.

Rationale: Psychological safety in communication leads to innovation and problem-solving. This question assesses the openness of team dialogue.

Rationale: Trust in commitment completion ensures smooth workflow. It reveals whether promises translate into action.

Rationale: Transparent decision-making builds collective ownership. It shows if information is shared evenly.

Rationale: A mistake-friendly culture encourages learning. This question assesses if errors are treated as growth opportunities.

Rationale: Fair distribution prevents burnout and resentment. It indicates whether tasks and responsibilities are openly managed.

Rationale: Honest feedback strengthens confidence in leadership. It measures the frequency and sincerity of performance reviews.

Rationale: Addressing conflict transparently prevents long-term tension. It shows if issues are handled in the open.

Rationale: Perceived information hoarding harms trust. This question uncovers hidden knowledge gaps.

Rationale: Visible progress metrics keep motivation high. It measures how transparent tracking and reporting are.

Rationale: Valuing opinions builds mutual respect. This question gauges if team contributions shape decisions.

Rationale: Cliques can create information silos and mistrust. It checks for social dynamics that impact openness.

Rationale: Defining roles prevents overlap and confusion. This question assesses role clarity within the team.

Rationale: Self-driven accountability reduces micromanagement. It measures proactive engagement in task completion.

Rationale: Missed deadlines often stem from ambiguity. This question highlights gaps in expectation setting.

Rationale: Escalation processes resolve conflicts quickly. It ensures accountability structures handle overlaps effectively.

Rationale: Positive recognition reinforces accountability. It shows if successes are acknowledged.

Rationale: Holding members accountable in reviews drives follow-through. It indicates how review structures support responsibility.

Rationale: Empowerment supports peer-to-peer accountability. It assesses whether team culture backs mutual responsibility.

Rationale: Decision-maker clarity speeds up resolution. This question evaluates decision rights and processes.

Rationale: Tool usage reflects accountability tracking. It shows whether digital systems support oversight.

Rationale: Constructive correction fosters growth and accountability. It checks if feedback on misses is solution-oriented.

Rationale: Prompt conflict resolution prevents escalation. This question measures willingness to engage in tough conversations.

Rationale: Psychological safety enables honest dialogue. It assesses whether differing views are welcomed.

Rationale: Mediation processes ensure fairness and consistency. This question checks if conflict protocols exist.

Rationale: Recurring issues signal poor resolution practices. It highlights repeats that need systematic fixes.

Rationale: Personalization of conflict damages relationships. This question identifies when focus shifts from tasks to personalities.

Rationale: Documentation ensures learning and prevents repeat issues. It evaluates post-conflict transparency.

Rationale: Skills gaps can hinder resolution. This question checks if training or support is needed.

Rationale: Constructive feedback drives positive outcomes. It assesses the tone and intent of conflict discussions.

Rationale: Comfort level shows power dynamics at play. It reveals barriers in upward feedback channels.

Rationale: Constructive conflict can build resilience. This question explores whether your team learns from disagreements.

Rationale: Documentation prevents process drift and confusion. It ensures everyone follows the same steps.

Rationale: Handoff clarity reduces delays. This question pinpoints weak links between tasks.

Rationale: Advance communication minimizes disruption. It measures change management effectiveness.

Rationale: Role assignment prevents overlap and gaps. This question assesses responsibility mapping.

Rationale: Tool adequacy impacts efficiency and quality. It reveals resource shortages or mismatches.

Rationale: Timely feedback drives continuous improvement. It checks if feedback integrates back into workflows.

Rationale: Follow-up habits keep projects moving. This question examines persistence in task management.

Rationale: Improvement channels empower innovation. It assesses openness to refining workflows.

Rationale: Redundancies drain time and morale. This question identifies opportunities to streamline.

Rationale: Metrics enable data-driven optimization. It shows whether you track and adjust based on performance.