Post Mentorship Survey | 50+ Insightful Feedback Questions

Trusted by 5000+ Brands

5 Must-Know Mistakes to Dodge in Your Post Mentorship Survey

Don't let your post mentorship survey gather dust in a folder. One common mistake is failing to share results with both mentors and mentees, which can erode trust and stifle growth. Transparency builds a culture of continuous improvement.

Poorly worded questions skew your data. Avoid asking leading phrases like "Was my guidance helpful?" and instead pose honest prompts such as "How clear were the goals we set together?" Using a template like 1:1 Mentoring Pre-/Post- Surveys | SFUSD helps you balance scale ratings with open responses. Thoughtful phrasing drives reliable insights.

At a nonprofit mentoring program, organizers once forgot to pilot their survey. The initial form asked "Did you like the program?" which yielded shallow yes/no answers. When they revised it to ask "What do you wish had been different in our sessions?", they unlocked richer feedback and spiked completion rates by 40%.

Another pitfall is skipping a pilot phase. Test your questions with a small group, review results, then refine. Learn from the Participants' and mentors' feedback to Cohort Survey - Open Seeds for ideas on crafting inclusive prompts. Once you run your final draft, use the Post Mentoring Program Survey link to launch confidently.

Program Experience Questions

These questions focus on participants' overall impressions of the mentorship journey, including structure, pacing, and resources provided. Gathering this data helps organizers understand what is working and where adjustments might be needed. For more detailed participant feedback, see our Mentorship Program Survey .

How satisfied were you with the overall structure of the mentorship program?
This question gauges general satisfaction to highlight strengths and areas where the program framework may require refinement.
Was the program duration appropriate for achieving your goals?
Duration affects engagement and goal completion, so understanding if timeframes align with participant needs is crucial.
Did the program schedule and session frequency fit your availability?
Assessing logistical fit ensures the program remains accessible and convenient for future cohorts.
Were the provided materials and resources clear and helpful?
Quality of resources directly impacts learning outcomes, making it important to know if participants found them valuable.
How user-friendly was the mentorship platform or communication tool?
Technical ease influences participation; this feedback helps identify any usability issues.
Did you receive timely reminders and updates about sessions?
Effective communication is key to engagement, so this question checks if participants felt well-informed.
Were you aware of all program milestones and deliverables?
Clarity around expectations prevents confusion and ensures participants can plan effectively.
Did the onboarding process prepare you adequately for the mentorship?
First impressions matter; this question reveals whether initial guidance set participants up for success.
Was the pace of the program too fast, too slow, or just right?
Finding the optimal pace is essential to maintain engagement without causing burnout or boredom.
Would you recommend this mentorship program to others?
Recommendation likelihood serves as a net promoter score indicator, reflecting overall program health.

Learning and Skill Development Questions

This section explores how effectively the program fostered new skills, knowledge, and professional growth. By focusing on learning outcomes, organizations can adapt content to better meet participant goals. Review our Post Mentoring Program Survey for related insights.

Which new skills did you acquire during the mentorship?
Identifying specific skills gained helps measure the program's educational value and focus areas.
How confident do you feel applying what you learned from the mentor?
Self-assessed confidence indicates whether knowledge transfer effectively empowered participants.
Did the program help you set realistic and achievable goals?
Goal-setting support is a key element of skill development, so this assesses its effectiveness.
Were the learning materials tailored to your professional background?
Customization matters; this question verifies relevance and personalization in content delivery.
How often did you practice or apply new skills between sessions?
Practical application reinforces learning, and this metric shows participant engagement levels.
Did you receive constructive feedback on your skill progress?
Feedback quality influences growth, making it critical to know if participants felt supported.
Which topics do you feel need more in-depth coverage?
Identifying gaps guides enhancements to curriculum depth and breadth in future runs.
How relevant were the exercises and case studies to real-world scenarios?
Relevance testing ensures content aligns with practical challenges participants face.
Were you provided with actionable resources to continue learning post-program?
Long-term learning support is vital; this evaluates the sustainability of skill development.
Do you feel the program advanced your career or academic goals?
Linking outcomes to objectives confirms the program's impact on participant trajectories.

Mentor Interaction Questions

This category assesses the quality of the mentee-mentor relationship, communication effectiveness, and mentor support. Understanding these factors ensures strong, productive pairings. Check out our Mentor Program Survey for mentor-focused feedback.

How well did your mentor understand your goals and challenges?
Alignment on objectives is crucial; this question reveals how effectively mentors tuned into mentee needs.
Did your mentor provide personalized guidance and advice?
Personalization drives engagement, so this probes the specificity of mentor support.
How accessible was your mentor when you needed assistance?
Availability impacts trust and progress, making this a key measure of support level.
Were mentoring sessions conducted in a respectful and supportive tone?
Communication style affects comfort and openness, so assessing respectfulness is vital.
Did your mentor challenge you to step outside your comfort zone?
Growth often happens when challenged; this question checks if mentors encouraged stretch goals.
How timely and actionable was the feedback you received from your mentor?
Prompt and clear feedback is essential for iterative learning and improvement.
Did your mentor share relevant industry insights or networks?
Networking and insider knowledge enrich the experience; this gauges mentor contributions beyond advice.
Were expectations and next steps clearly defined after each session?
Clarity around takeaways ensures that mentees leave sessions with a plan for progress.
Did you feel encouraged to express concerns or ask questions freely?
Open dialogue is foundational to trust; this checks whether mentees felt psychologically safe.
How would you rate your overall rapport with your mentor?
Relationship quality is a predictor of program success, so this summarizes interpersonal dynamics.

Post-Mentorship Outcomes Questions

These questions measure the tangible results and longer-term impacts of the mentorship experience. Insights here inform the real-world value and return on investment of the program. See related trends in our Mentoring Program Survey .

Have you achieved the goals you set at the start of the mentorship?
Assessing goal completion demonstrates the program's effectiveness in delivering promised outcomes.
Did the mentorship influence your career trajectory or next steps?
Measuring impact on decisions and direction showcases the program's strategic value.
Have you applied any strategies or techniques learned during the program?
Real-world application is a strong indicator of knowledge retention and usefulness.
Did your confidence level improve in professional or academic settings?
Confidence growth often correlates with better performance and willingness to take on challenges.
Have you maintained communication with your mentor since program completion?
Ongoing relationships reflect sustainable connections and long-term support.
Has the program expanded your professional network?
Network growth can lead to opportunities, so tracking this outcome is key.
Did you receive any tangible benefits (e.g., job offers, certifications) post-mentorship?
Concrete benefits validate program ROI and attract future participants.
Would you participate in another mentorship cycle with the same mentor?
Repeat interest indicates satisfaction and value derived from the mentor match.
Did any personal habits or routines change as a result of the mentorship?
Behavioral shifts can be early signs of lasting impact, revealing deeper program effects.
How likely are you to refer others to this mentorship program?
Referral intention serves as a strong endorsement metric and speaks to overall quality.

Program Improvement and Feedback Questions

This section invites candid suggestions for enhancing the program's future iterations. Constructive feedback drives continuous improvement and innovation. Explore aggregated data in our Program Feedback Survey .

What aspect of the program did you find most valuable and why?
Highlighting strengths helps reinforce successful elements in future designs.
Which component of the program needs the most improvement?
Direct suggestions on weaker areas guide targeted enhancements.
Were there any topics you wish had been covered in more depth?
Participant-driven content requests inform curriculum expansion priorities.
How could communication between organizers and participants be improved?
Feedback on logistics and updates ensures smoother experiences and fewer misunderstandings.
Do you have suggestions for improving mentor-matching processes?
Better pairing strategies can lead to more effective collaborations and outcomes.
What support resources would you like to see added or enhanced?
Identifying resource needs allows for targeted investments in tools and materials.
How could the program better accommodate diverse learning styles?
Inclusivity in learning design ensures the program resonates with a wide range of participants.
Were any participation barriers unaddressed? Please explain.
Understanding obstacles helps reduce friction and increase accessibility.
Do you have ideas for post-program alumni engagement?
Maintaining community momentum can boost long-term program reputation and value.
Any additional comments or suggestions?
Open-ended feedback provides space for insights that structured questions might miss.