Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey

Trusted by 5000+ Brands

Top Secrets to Ace Your Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey

The maslach burnout inventory general survey unlocks clear insights into workplace stress and fatigue. It measures the three dimensions of burnout - exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy. Administering it correctly can reveal trends and guide targeted action. With robust data, leaders move from guesswork to real solutions.

To start, define your goals. Are you tracking emotional exhaustion or workplace detachment? Sample questions like "I feel emotionally drained from my work." anchor the tool in real feelings. Another good item is "I feel I treat some recipients as if they were impersonal objects." These clear prompts make analysis straightforward.

Imagine Sarah, an HR manager, who launches the survey as a poll during annual reviews. She cites a study by BMC Health Services Research confirming the survey's reliability. Her team saw a 15% rise in honest responses when they ensure confidentiality. That trust fuels actionable insights.

Keep it short - nine items work wonders, as shown in the MBI-GS9 research. Use plain language and avoid jargon. You can compare results over time or against industry norms for context and clarity.

Consider pairing the maslach burnout inventory general survey with an Employee Burnout Survey to broaden your view. This dual approach highlights stress triggers and coping gaps. The trick is balance - too many forms, and fatigue creeps in.

Finally, share results openly. A follow-up meeting to discuss findings shows you value input. That transparency builds a culture of trust and improvement.

Artistic 3D voxel art of burnout inventory survey

Artistic 3D voxel art of emotional exhaustion questionnaire flow

5 Must-Know Mistakes to Avoid When Running Your Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey

When you design a maslach burnout inventory general survey, simple missteps can skew the whole picture. Avoid rookie errors like skipping clarity checks or ignoring context. These slip-ups cost you time and trust. Get it right by learning common pitfalls.

Mistake #1: Overlooking anonymity. Employees rarely open up if they fear exposure. Always reassure respondents that their answers stay confidential. Tip: Use third-party tools or code identifiers to protect identities.

Mistake #2: Misreading cynicism items. One ambiguous statement can distort scores, and researchers highlighted this in a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Expect item phrasing like "I have become more callous toward people since I took this job." Confirm your team understands what each item measures.

Mistake #3: Cramming too many scales. A nine-item inventory is lean by design. If you sprinkle in extra Likert scales, you risk survey fatigue. Instead, ask crisp prompts like "How often do you feel burned out by your work?" and stick to the core dimensions.

Mistake #4: Launching at the wrong time. Running your survey during peak deadlines invites rushed answers. Choose calm periods - post-project wrap or monthly check-ins. For example, a finance team saw honest feedback rise by 20% when they surveyed after month-end close.

Mistake #5: Skipping a pilot test. Always pilot with a small group. Gather feedback on phrasing and length. Then roll out your final version and follow up with an Burnout Survey debrief to show you value their voice.

Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey Questions

Our general survey questions aim to capture broad indicators of burnout across various professions, helping organizations identify early warning signs. These items assess overall feelings of exhaustion, detachment, and efficacy that relate to well-being and productivity. Learn more in our Workplace Mental Health Survey .

How often do you feel emotionally drained by your work?
This question gauges the frequency of emotional fatigue, a core dimension of burnout. Tracking this helps organizations prioritize mental health resources.
How frequently do you feel fatigued before your workday begins?
Measuring pre-work fatigue identifies the carry-over effect of stress from one day to the next. Early signs here can signal the need for workload adjustments.
To what extent do you feel overwhelmed by your job demands?
This item assesses perceived workload pressure, a key burnout driver. Responses guide efforts to balance responsibilities and support staff.
How often do you feel frustrated when interacting with clients or customers?
Frustration in client interactions reflects emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Understanding this helps improve interpersonal skill training.
How often do you feel physically exhausted at the end of a workday?
Physical exhaustion complements emotional measures to provide a holistic view of burnout. This indicator can prompt interventions around rest and recovery.
How often do you feel detached or indifferent toward your work?
Detachment is a sign of depersonalization and cynicism. Identifying these feelings supports initiatives to rebuild engagement.
To what degree do you feel ineffective in completing your tasks?
Perceived inefficacy links directly to personal accomplishment. Addressing this can enhance training and recognition programs.
How frequently do you experience difficulty concentrating at work?
Concentration issues often accompany chronic stress and burnout. Spotting this early enables cognitive support strategies.
How often do you feel you accomplish worthwhile things at work?
This positive indicator balances negative items and measures personal accomplishment. Higher scores here correlate with resilience and job satisfaction.
How often do you feel you are performing at your best?
Self-rated performance highlights perceived competence under stress. Tracking changes helps evaluate intervention effectiveness.

Emotional Exhaustion Survey Questions

Emotional exhaustion is the hallmark of burnout, reflecting the depletion of emotional resources that professionals experience over time. This section focuses on in-depth measurement of exhaustion symptoms to support early detection and stress management strategies. Explore our Stress Level Survey .

I feel used up at the end of the workday.
This classic MBI item captures end-of-day fatigue, a direct sign of emotional resource depletion. Frequent reports suggest the need for workload redistribution.
I feel fatigued when I get up in the morning and have to face another day at work.
Morning fatigue indicates burnout's carryover into personal life and rest periods. It highlights the importance of recovery and sleep quality.
I feel I am at the end of my rope.
This metaphor captures extreme emotional exhaustion and helplessness. High scores signal a potential crisis requiring immediate support.
I feel burned out from my work.
A direct self-assessment of burnout intensity, this question offers a clear indicator of overall emotional health. It's essential for tracking progress over time.
I feel drained by the emotional demands of my job.
Emotional demands are a known stressor in service roles. This item helps quantify their specific impact on staff well-being.
I feel exhausted when I think about another day at work.
Anticipatory exhaustion highlights chronic stress before tasks even begin. Addressing this can reduce absenteeism and improve morale.
I feel I give more than I have to give.
This question assesses disproportionate emotional investment, common in caregiving professions. It underscores the need for boundary setting.
I feel like every day at work is a challenge to get through.
Daily struggle indicates pervasive exhaustion and reduced resilience. Management can use this insight for workflow redesign.
I feel worn out at the end of the day.
General weariness is a broad measure of burnout's toll. It validates the need for both organizational and personal coping strategies.
I feel frustrated by my work tasks.
Frustration often coexists with exhaustion, reinforcing burnout risk. Identifying sources of frustration can guide process improvements.

Cynicism and Depersonalization Questions

Cynicism, also known as depersonalization, reflects negative, detached attitudes toward work and others, leading to decreased empathy. Understanding these dimensions helps organizations address morale and interpersonal dynamics. Check relevant benchmarks in the NDNQI On Burnout Survey .

I feel I treat some recipients as if they were impersonal objects.
This classic depersonalization item measures emotional distancing from service recipients. High scores indicate detachment needing empathy training.
I have become more callous toward people since I took this job.
Growing callousness reflects a coping mechanism under stress. Recognizing it early can preserve relationship quality and satisfaction.
I worry that this job is hardening me emotionally.
This question assesses self-awareness of emotional blunting. It helps in planning interventions to restore compassion.
I feel indifferent about the outcomes of my work.
Indifference signals lost motivation and engagement. Addressing this can renew purpose and organizational commitment.
I have lost interest in my work since starting this role.
Decreased interest marks a shift toward cynicism and disengagement. It points to the need for role enrichment or rotation.
I feel I give less of myself emotionally.
Emotional withdrawal is a common defense against overload. Identifying it helps managers support gradual reinvestment strategies.
I feel detached when interacting with clients or patients.
This item tracks relational distancing that harms service quality. Early action can restore positive client-staff relationships.
I feel I am not making a meaningful connection with others at work.
Meaningful connections boost job satisfaction and reduce turnover. This question highlights gaps in team cohesion.
I feel cynical about whether my work makes a difference.
Cynicism about impact undermines motivation. High scores warrant leadership efforts to communicate mission and successes.
I feel disconnected from my colleagues.
Social disconnection exacerbates isolation and stress. Encouraging team-building can counteract these effects.

Personal Accomplishment Inventory Questions

Personal accomplishment measures the sense of competence and achievement professionals derive from their work. Tracking these positive dimensions can guide programs to bolster skills and recognition. Learn best practices in our Stress Management Survey .

I feel I am positively influencing other people's lives through my work.
This question captures meaningful impact, boosting morale and retention. Recognizing these contributions reinforces staff value.
I feel exhilarated after I finish some tasks.
Exhilaration signals mastery and engagement. Encouraging task variety can amplify these positive feelings.
I can easily create a relaxed atmosphere with my colleagues.
Comfortable team dynamics enhance collaboration and reduce stress. This measure highlights areas for cultural improvement.
I feel I'm making an effective contribution to what the organization does.
Perceived effectiveness strengthens organizational commitment. Sharing success stories can further validate this perception.
I feel stimulated by my work.
Work stimulation indicates alignment with skills and interests. It's a key predictor of long-term job satisfaction.
I feel I am up to the challenges of my job.
Self-confidence in meeting challenges reflects resilience. Training should build on this strength to handle future demands.
I have accomplished many worthwhile things in this position.
Listing achievements promotes self-efficacy and pride. This supports continuous performance improvement initiatives.
In my work, I feel confident that I am effective at getting things done.
Task effectiveness correlates with lower burnout risk. This insight informs personalized coaching plans.
I feel proud of the work I do.
Pride fosters loyalty and motivation. Celebrating wins publicly can reinforce positive culture.
I feel encouraged by feedback I receive.
Constructive feedback nurtures growth and confidence. This measure helps refine performance review processes.

Frequency and Intensity Burnout Questions

This section examines both how often and how intensely burnout symptoms occur to provide a nuanced view of staff well-being. Measuring these aspects can help tailor interventions to severity and patterns. Refer to our Job Stress Survey for related metrics.

How often do you feel overwhelmed by unmanageable workload?
Frequency of overwhelm indicates chronic stress levels. It helps prioritize workload balancing efforts.
How intense is the stress you experience when meeting deadlines?
Stress intensity informs the severity of time-pressure effects. Tailored time-management support can mitigate risks.
How often do you ruminate about work problems outside of office hours?
Off-hours rumination shows burnout spillover into personal life. Encouraging boundary setting supports recovery.
How intense is your emotional response to workplace conflicts?
Measuring conflict intensity helps identify high-risk team dynamics. Conflict resolution training can then be targeted.
How often do you feel you cannot disconnect from work mentally?
Mental disconnection frequency signals poor work-life balance. Promoting detachment rituals can improve well-being.
How intense is the fatigue you experience during work hours?
On-the-job fatigue intensity highlights immediate performance risks. Adjustments to break schedules may be necessary.
How often do you need recovery time after a stressful period at work?
Recovery needs frequency indicates cumulative stress impact. Supporting micro-rest breaks can enhance resilience.
How intense is your sense of frustration when tasks accumulate?
Frustration intensity can lead to disengagement quickly. Early workload reviews help prevent escalation.
How often do you feel unable to meet your own performance standards?
Failing personal standards frequency erodes self-esteem. Coaching can realign expectations to realistic goals.
How intense is your sense of frustration when tasks accumulate?
High frustration levels signal urgent need for support and process optimization. Addressing root causes reduces burnout risk.

Educator-Focused Burnout Survey Questions

Educators face unique stressors that can lead to burnout, from large class sizes to emotional demands of teaching. This category tailors items to teaching professionals to support retention and well-being. Discover similar tools in our Teacher Burnout Survey .

I feel overwhelmed by the emotional demands of my students.
Student emotional needs can be draining and affect teacher well-being. Recognizing this informs support strategies for counseling resources.
I feel I have too much paperwork to handle effectively.
Administrative load contributes to time pressure and stress. Streamlining processes can improve teaching focus.
I feel drained by classroom management challenges.
Behavioral issues increase emotional labor and fatigue. Professional development in classroom strategies can alleviate this burden.
I feel my teaching efforts go unappreciated.
Lack of recognition undermines motivation and job satisfaction. Building feedback loops can restore acknowledgment.
I feel I lack support from school administration.
Perceived administrative neglect heightens stress. Improving leadership communication fosters trust and morale.
I feel I give more in class than I have energy for.
Exceeding energy limits leads to rapid burnout among educators. Advocating for realistic workload expectations is crucial.
I feel unable to maintain a healthy work-life balance.
Poor balance affects teacher retention and mental health. Promoting flexible scheduling and self-care practices can help.
I feel frustrated by limited resources in my school.
Resource constraints hinder teaching effectiveness and satisfaction. Identifying resource gaps guides budget allocations.
I feel cynical about the education system.
Systemic cynicism reflects broader professional disenchantment. Engaging educators in reform discussions can renew hope.
I feel my passion for teaching has diminished.
Loss of passion signals advanced burnout that may lead to turnover. Early interventions can reignite vocational commitment.

FAQ

What is the Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey (MBI-GS) and how is it used?

The Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey (MBI-GS) is a validated burnout survey template measuring work-related exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy. It's used by HR and researchers to benchmark employee burnout levels via standardized MBI-GS survey results. Administer online or on paper for scalable, actionable insights.

What are the key dimensions measured by the MBI-GS?

The MBI-GS survey template measures three core dimensions: emotional exhaustion, cynicism (depersonalization), and reduced professional efficacy. Each dimension uses example questions to score participant responses on a 7-point frequency scale. These standardized MBI-GS survey dimensions help organizations identify specific burnout patterns for targeted intervention and compare group-level burnout across teams.

How does the MBI-GS differ from other versions of the Maslach Burnout Inventory?

The MBI-GS differs from other Maslach Burnout Inventory versions by targeting general work populations instead of specific professions. Its burnout survey template omits occupation-specific items found in the MBI-HSS and MBI-ES, offering more universal example questions. This flexible design supports cross-industry burnout assessment and benchmarking and free survey distribution online.

What types of professionals is the MBI-GS designed for?

The MBI-GS survey template is designed for a broad range of professionals, including office staff, educators, healthcare workers, service industry teams, and leadership teams. Its general survey structure suits any role, enabling organizations to deploy a free survey tool for early burnout detection, analysis, and prevention across diverse workforces.

How can the MBI-GS help in identifying burnout in the workplace?

The MBI-GS burnout survey template identifies burnout by quantifying emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and low efficacy through standardized scoring. Step-by-step, employees rate example questions on frequency scales, generating actionable reports. This early detection method lets organizations implement targeted wellness programs before burnout escalates, improving retention and workplace health metrics with a free survey option.

What are some sample questions included in the MBI-GS?

Sample questions in the MBI-GS survey template include: 'I feel emotionally drained from my work,' 'I have become cynical about the importance of my job,' and 'I feel I'm not making an effective contribution.' These example questions use a 7-point scale, offering clear metrics for burnout analysis in a free survey setup.

How long does it take to complete the MBI-GS?

Completing the MBI-GS burnout survey takes approximately 10 - 15 minutes. Respondents rate 16 example questions on a 7-point frequency scale. This concise survey template balances depth and efficiency, making it ideal for free survey distribution and high completion rates without sacrificing psychometric reliability in workplace assessments.

Is the MBI-GS available in multiple languages?

The MBI-GS survey template is available in over 30 languages, including English, Spanish, French, and Mandarin. Each translation maintains validated wording for consistent psychometric properties. Organizations can access these language versions via licensed providers or free survey partner platforms to support diverse, multilingual employee burnout assessments globally.

What are the psychometric properties of the MBI-GS?

The MBI-GS survey's psychometric properties include high internal consistency (Cronbach's α > .70 for all three dimensions), strong test-retest reliability, and validated factor structure. These metrics ensure our burnout survey template delivers reliable, reproducible results, making it a trusted tool for research, HR analytics, and free survey programs.

How can organizations implement the MBI-GS to assess employee burnout?

Organizations can implement the MBI-GS burnout survey template by selecting a licensed survey platform or free survey provider, customizing communication materials, and scheduling employee assessments quarterly or annually. Steps: obtain permission for translations, configure online distribution, collect responses, and analyze results with standard reporting dashboards for targeted intervention and continuous improvement.