PVI-swedepad-2-time-rethink-practice

Do/did you change your endovascular treatments after the publication/communication of SWEDEPAD 2 (claudicants) outcomes ?
Yes, absolutely… I don’t use PTX devices anymore
No, not at all… I continue my PTX device treatment
No, not at all… I stopped the PTX use already earlier
Yes, in some patients/cases, I don’t use PTX anymore, where I did earlier
If you changed, how did you change?
I changed completely to LIMUS devices
I changed completely to bare devices
I’m still using PTX coated balloons, but no PTX stents anymore
I’m still using PTX stents, but no PTX coated balloons anymore
N/A (I didn’t change anything)
Do you need more evidence post-SWEDEPAD 2?
No, I’m convinced by the SWEDEPAD 2
No, I’m convinced by previous efficacy and safety papers supporting PTX use
No, I’m following my own experiences
Yes, an additional RCT with more adjudication and different endpoints
Yes, more registry (national) data worldwide
Which are your preferred (primary) endpoints for a femoropopliteal study in claudicants?
Quality of Life Vascular scoring systems (like in SWEDEPAD 2)
Primary patency
Freedom from reintervention
Survival
Maximum walking distance (more specified than Rutherford classification)
Do you believe in a class effect of PTX eluting devices?
Yes
No
I don’t know
{"name":"PVI-swedepad-2-time-rethink-practice", "url":"https://www.poll-maker.com/QEP42N2SV","txt":"Do\/did you change your endovascular treatments after the publication\/communication of SWEDEPAD 2 (claudicants) outcomes ?, If you changed, how did you change?, Do you need more evidence post-SWEDEPAD 2?","img":"https://www.poll-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}